Empathy, the ability to understand and share the feelings of another, has significant implications for epistemology, the study of knowledge. Exploring the relationship between empathy and epistemology reveals that empathy can be a valuable tool for understanding others’ perspectives and even shaping our own knowledge.
At its core, narrative medicine is not just about empathy—it is about epistemology: how we know what we know in medicine.It challenges the idea that data alone is the truth. It values subjective experience as evidence.
It reminds us that meaning—grief, identity, uncertainty—is not noise in the signal; it’s part of the diagnosis.The most powerful implication of this is shared authority. When patients’ stories are treated as essential sources of knowledge—not anecdotal extras—we begin to shift the asymmetry that defines much of clinical care.This is why narrative medicine can be uncomfortable. It doesn’t just ask clinicians to listen; it asks systems to change.
So, Has Narrative Medicine Left the Margins?
In scholarship? Yes.
In spirit? Often.
In systems? Not yet.
If we want systems that truly centre patient voices, we have to move from metaphor to mechanism.
Not just asking for stories—but being changed by them.
https://patientvoicecollective.substack.com?utm_source=navbar&utm_medium=web
https://www.cureus.com/articles/395031-from-stories-to-science-mapping-global-trends-in-narrative-medicine-research-2004-2024#!/