Tag: wellness

Preventive hysterectomy and quality of life: new research highlights the need for tailored support

What was the study about?

The researchers wanted to understand how women with Lynch syndrome feel after having a preventive hysterectomy(surgery to remove the uterus, sometimes along with the ovaries) to lower their risk of womb cancer. They looked at quality of life, emotional wellbeing, menopause symptoms, sexual health, and whether women regretted their decision. 

What did they find?

The good news:

  • Most women were happy they had the surgery.
  • Very few said they regretted their decision.
  • Many reported much less anxiety about developing womb cancer after surgery.
  • Overall quality of life was generally good, especially when menopause symptoms were well managed. 

The biggest challenge:

  • Women who had their ovaries removed before natural menopause often experienced significant menopausal symptoms, such as:
    • hot flushes
    • night sweats
    • vaginal dryness
    • lower sex drive
    • mood changes
    • sleep problems
  • These symptoms were much less severe in women who used hormone replacement therapy (HRT), when it was appropriate for them. 

Did it affect sex life?

For most women, sexual function was not dramatically worse after surgery. Some experienced changes, particularly if they went into surgical menopause, but many remained satisfied with their sexual relationships, especially when menopause symptoms were treated. 

What does this mean for someone with Lynch syndrome?

The study suggests that:

  • Preventive hysterectomy can provide significant peace of mind by greatly reducing the risk of endometrial (womb) cancer.
  • The decision isn’t just about preventing cancer—it’s also about preparing for the effects of surgery, particularly if the ovaries are removed.
  • Good counselling before surgery and appropriate HRT afterwards (for women who can safely take it) can make a big difference to quality of life. 

The bottom line

The message is reassuring rather than alarming. Most women with Lynch syndrome who chose preventive hysterectomy felt it was the right decision, experienced less worry about cancer, and had a good quality of life afterwards. The main issue wasn’t the hysterectomy itself—it was managing the symptoms of early menopause if the ovaries were also removed, and HRT helped many women cope with those symptoms. 

https://www.lynch-syndrome-uk.org/post/preventive-hysterectomy-quality-of-life-study

“Could taking aspirin halve the risk of bowel cancer?”

Podcast: https://www.genomicsengland.co.uk/podcasts/could-taking-aspirin-halve-the-risk-of-bowel-cancer

1. Low-dose aspirin appears to significantly reduce bowel cancer risk in people with Lynch syndrome

2. Earlier research showed about a 50% reduction in bowel cancer

3. Lynch syndrome is a major inherited cancer-risk condition

4. Prevention is a growing role for genomics

5. Aspirin is not risk-free

6. Screening remains extremely important

7. Family testing can be life-changing

8. Scientists are still studying how aspirin works

Bottom line

The podcast’s core message is that for people with Lynch syndrome, a daily low-dose aspirin regimen could become a powerful, relatively simple way to reduce bowel cancer risk, especially when combined with genomic testing and regular screening.
It highlights how genetic knowledge can enable earlier and more effective cancer prevention.

Cancer almost killed me. We’re treating this disease all wrong

“I am a survivor of early onset rectal cancer(Age 27). Chemotherapy, radiotherapy and brutal surgery saved my life, removing my tumour along with my large intestine, bladder, prostate, rectum, pelvic floor and the base of my spine. I now live with two stoma bags and a body irrevocably changed by treatment.”

I’m confronted by an unpleasant truth: we brace for diagnosis and invest in treatments while neglecting prevention.

Prevention is often deprioritised because its benefits are delayed, less visible, and harder to measure, unlike treatment which delivers immediate, tangible outcomes.

Cancer cases are projected to rise sharply by 2050, making a treatment-focused model economically and practically unsustainable.

Up to 40% of cancers are preventable, yet most research funding is still directed toward treatment rather than prevention.

A common belief is that prevention is a weak market, as it requires convincing healthy people to take action.

This is contradicted by widespread adoption of preventive drugs like statins and Ozempic, showing people will engage when benefits are clear and tangible.

Historical failures in dietary supplement trials created lasting scepticism and made funders more risk-averse toward prevention research.

Advances in genetics, biomarkers, and technology now make targeted, cost-effective prevention strategies more feasible.

Political and media incentives favour treatment, as saving identifiable patients attracts more attention than preventing future cases.

This imbalance in visibility and incentives drives funding and policy decisions.

Reframing prevention as urgent, feasible, and scalable is essential to reduce cancer burden and protect healthcare systems.

https://www.thetimes.com/uk/healthcare/article/cancer-research-cure-prevention-scientist-oxford-fnpmzqfbr

Prospective Lynch syndrome database

A prospective Lynch syndrome database is important because it allows researchers, clinicians, and policymakers to collect and analyse long-term, standardised data on people with Lynch syndrome (LS).

(Using Chat GPT)

📌 In short: A prospective Lynch syndrome database is essential because it produces high-quality, unbiased evidence on cancer risks, surveillance effectiveness, and preventive strategies, directly improving patient care and shaping clinical guidelines.

Here are the key reasons why it matters, based only on reliable clinical and research perspectives:

  1. Natural history understanding
    • Prospective data (collected forward in time) helps clarify the true risks of different cancers (colorectal, endometrial, ovarian, gastric, etc.) in Lynch syndrome carriers.
    • It reduces biases compared to retrospective reports, which often overestimate risks due to selective reporting of severe cases.
  2. Better risk stratification
    • Different mismatch repair (MMR) gene variants (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2, EPCAM) carry different cancer risks.
    • A prospective database helps define more precise, gene-specific and even sex-specific risk estimates, which guide personalized surveillance.
  3. Evaluation of surveillance effectiveness
    • Prospective registries allow direct measurement of how colonoscopy intervals (e.g., every 1–2 years) affect cancer incidence, stage at diagnosis, and mortality.
    • They can test whether surveillance reduces advanced cancers, enabling evidence-based guideline updates.
  4. Assessment of preventive strategies
    • Allows evaluation of risk-reducing interventions such as aspirin (e.g., CAPP2/CAPP3 trials), prophylactic surgeries, or lifestyle modifications.
    • Can help identify who benefits most from preventive measures.
  5. Improved clinical counseling
    • Physicians and genetic counselors can give patients more reliable, individualized risk information, reducing uncertainty and supporting informed decisions.
  6. Data for health policy
    • National or international databases provide evidence for cost-effectiveness of surveillance and preventive programs.
    • This supports resource allocation and insurance coverage for Lynch syndrome management.
  7. Research opportunities
    • Creates a resource for studying modifiers of cancer risk (genetic, environmental, lifestyle).
    • Enables collaboration across centers and countries for rare cancers within LS populations.

https://plsd.eu

EVERY STORY COUNTS

Especially on World Cancer Day.

Cancer is more than just a medical diagnosis—it’s a deeply personal matter. Behind every diagnosis lies a unique human story – stories of grief, pain, healing, resilience, love and more.

That’s why a people-centred approach to cancer care that fully integrates each individual’s unique needs, with compassion and empathy, leads to the best health outcomes.

Why is it so hard to….TREAT THE PERSON, NOT JUST THE DISEASE.

People living with cancer don’t always feel heard, seen, or understood. They might feel alienated and voiceless at a time when they’re also learning to navigate an unfamiliar and confusing health system, not to mention dealing with the emotional highs and lows of cancer diagnosis, treatment, or recovery.

People-centred cancer care represents an opportunity to refocus, rewire, and rewrite how we think about cancer, to embrace people’s differences, and to make sure that everyone is seen for who they really are and has access to the care they need. 

Primary Care Research into Cancer(PRICAN)

What is PRICAN?

Cancer represents a significant public health challenge in Ireland. Forecasts also indicate a potential doubling of cancer diagnoses between 2010 and 2040, primarily due to an ageing population. 

In recent years, there has been a shift in cancer control strategies towards prioritising prevention and early diagnosis, as the most cost-effective long-term approach to cancer control.

The National Cancer Strategy explicitly calls for an expanded role for general practitioners (GPs) in managing the entire cancer continuum, from prevention and early diagnosis to treatment and ongoing survivor support.

Despite its increasing importance in cancer control, primary care research has historically received less funding compared to laboratory and hospital-based research.

Whilst screening enables early detection of some presymptomatic cancer, approximately 85% of cancers are diagnosed after the onset of symptoms . This fact underscores the importance of equipping primary care with robust clinical guidelines and efficient referral pathways. 

The anticipated rise in cancer incidence demands proactive measures to strengthen the Irish healthcare system. By recognising the critical role of primary care across the cancer care continuum, and adopting a strategic approach to investment in research, Ireland can develop and implement evidence-based policies and strategies. This approach will not only mitigate the impacts of increasing cancer incidence but also position Ireland at the forefront of innovative and effective cancer care.

https://prican.eu

Know your family history

Many men with cancer in the family worry that they are at greater risk of getting it themselves. But this isn’t the case for most people. Cancer is a common disease among older people, so most families will include at least one person who has had cancer.

The more relatives who have had cancer, and the younger they were at diagnosis, the stronger your family history. You may have a strong family history if any of these situations apply to you:

  • More than two close relatives on the same side of your family have had cancer.
  • The cancers developed when they were young (under the age of 50).
  • One of your relatives has had a gene fault found by genetic tests.

5 – 10% of cancers are linked to an inherited gene fault.

What should I do if I have a family history of cancer?

Talk to your doctor who can help you find out if your family history of cancer is of concern. Your doctor may suggest that you visit regularly for screening. In this way, you can pick up problems early.  

https://www.independent.ie/life/health-wellbeing/health-features/cancer-in-the-family-our-sister-was-adopted-to-america-if-we-hadnt-found-her-my-brother-and-i-could-have-died-of-cancer/a680132515.html

No other landscape in medicine has changed as drastically as the field of Clinical Genetics – Is Ireland behind the curve?

Advances in technology have been a major driver of the explosion of knowledge in genetics, now allowing us to sequence the entire human genome in a short period of time and at a fraction of the cost of previous years.

This has led to a better understanding of the natural history of cancer, the ability to assess genetic risk for cancer across populations, the development of clinical management strategies to reduce cancer risk, the development of novel therapeutic agents which target genetic alterations, and to improved education of patients and providers about genetic risk.

Hereditary cancer is hard enough to navigate, so we are thankful for patient-friendly information to help inform the decision-making process.

https://www.stjames.ie/cancer/yourtreatmentandcare/servicesandtreatments/cancergeneticsservice/

Genetic testing is a vital tool in enabling individuals to be proactive in their health care to achieve the best possible outcomes.

It’s very important for everyone to understand their cancer risks based on their personal or family history since their personal risk level may necessitate earlier, more frequent, and/or more intensive cancer surveillance.

This is the best way to ensure that you are doing everything you can to prevent cancer or catch it early when treatment has the best outcome.

At present cancer genetics services in Ireland are underdeveloped and underfunded. Only a fraction of staff required are in place. As a result long waiting times, extra cost to the state because cancers are not prevented and discovered at a later stage.

Managing Neuropathy

Each chemotherapy drug or combination has its own side effects. Most side effects can be easily controlled by medicines. Not everyone will have the same side effects. Your healthcare team will give you information about the side effects that are most likely to affect you. You might find it helpful to keep a note of any that you experience.

Oxaliplatin (Eloxatin®)

You might have tingling or numbness in your hands and feet. This is called peripheral neuropathy. Talk to your medical team if you have these symptoms.

You may get pins and needles, weakness or numbness. This can make it hard to do everyday things like writing, picking up small items and walking. These symptoms can be triggered or made worse by the cold. Your healthcare team may advise you to wear gloves when you use the fridge or freezer and avoid chilled food or drinks for a few days after each treatment.

You may get neuropathy symptoms during your chemotherapy cycle and for up to two weeks afterwards. Symptoms may improve once you finish treatment but in some people, neuropathy can last for months or years after treatment.

Tell your healthcare team if you have any symptoms of neuropathy. If the symptoms are affecting your daily life, your doctor may suggest lowering the dose of oxaliplatin or changing your treatment.

https://twitter.com/bowelcanceruk/status/1868033470100074851

Guidelines for the management of hereditary colorectal cancer from the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG)/Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI)/United Kingdom Cancer Genetics Group (UKCGG)

2019: A systematic review of 10 189 publications was undertaken to develop 67 evidence and expert opinion-based recommendations for the management of hereditary CRC risk. Ten research recommendations are also prioritised to inform clinical management of people at hereditary CRC risk.

Objective:

To provide a clear strategy for the management of people at hereditary risk of colorectal cancer (CRC), which includes diagnosis, endoscopic management, prevention and surgical care.

Lynch syndrome (LS)

  • We recommend that for all people when first diagnosed with CRC, testing using immunohistochemistry (IHC) for MMR proteins or microsatellite instability is used to identify tumours with deficient DNA MMR, and to guide further sequential testing for LS. (GRADE of evidence: moderate; Strength of recommendation: strong)
  • We recommend that colonoscopic surveillance should be performed at a 2 yearly interval for all LS patients. (GRADE of evidence: moderate; Strength of recommendation: strong)
  • We recommend that age of onset of surveillance colonoscopy should be stratified according to the LS-associated gene. We recommend colonoscopy from age 25 years for MLH1 and MSH2 mutation carriers and 35 years for MSH6 and PMS2mutation carriers. There are insufficient data to support stratifying age of onset of surveillance by gender. (GRADE of evidence: moderate; Strength of recommendation: strong)
  • We suggest that for LS patients with MLH1 or MSH2 mutations who develop colon cancer or colonic neoplasia not amenable to endoscopic control, the decision to perform segmental versus total/near total colectomy should balance the risks of metachronous cancer, the functional consequences of surgery, the patient’s age and patient’s wishes. (GRADE of evidence: Moderate; Strength of recommendation: strong)
  • We recommend that for LS patients with MSH6 or PMS2 mutations there is insufficient evidence for oncological benefit of extended colectomy over segmental resection. (GRADE of evidence: low; Strength of recommendation: strong)
  • We suggest that when abdominal-perineal excision can be avoided, a standard low anterior resection is a reasonable option to treat rectal cancers in LS patients, even though the residual colon is at high-risk of metachronous neoplasia. (GRADE of evidence: low; Strength of recommendation: weak)
  • We recommend that gastric, small bowel, or pancreatic surveillance in LS patients is only performed in the context of a clinical trial. (GRADE of evidence: low; Strength of recommendation: strong)
  • We recommend screening for H elicobacter pylori in patients with LS and subsequent eradication therapy if indicated. (GRADE of evidence: low; Strength of recommendation: strong)

https://gut.bmj.com/content/69/3/411#article-bottom